When a futures position is liquidated, every exchange absorbs the loss in the same order: the market takes the position first, the insurance fund covers what the market can't, and only when the fund can't cope does auto-deleveraging (ADL) kick in and force-close the most profitable, most leveraged positions on the other side. The differences are in what liquidation costs you, how big the fund is and when ADL triggers. Insurance fund balances read from official public APIs on 2026-10-17: about 791 million USDT plus 500 million USDC in Binance's fund for BTCUSDT, about 388 million USDT in Bybit's shared BTCUSDT pool, about 140 million USDT for Gate's USDT-margined perps, and about 91.76 million USDT for OKX's BTC-USDT perp.
For an ordinary trader the plainest takeaway is that being liquidated always costs more than stopping out yourself. On top of the normal fee there is a liquidation or clearance fee, and most of the margin left over goes to the insurance fund. None of that is a trading fee, so no rebate comes back. Below are the rules side by side, then a 10,000 USDT position worked through (checked 2026-10-17).
Quick answer
- Order: market → insurance fund → ADL, the same on all five exchanges.
- Liquidation costs: Gate states a 0.075% liquidation fee rate. OKX charges your current taker rate as the liquidation fee plus a clearance fee equal to the maintenance margin. Binance charges a liquidation clearance fee on notional at a rate set in its trading rules. MEXC's official API lists a 0.04% liquidation fee rate for BTC_USDT.
- ADL trigger: Bybit uses an 8-hour drawdown trigger line per trading pair (30% in its official example). Bitget triggers when that coin's insurance fund is used up. Binance, OKX and Gate say when the fund can't take over the position.
- ADL ranking: everywhere, more profit and more leverage puts you nearer the front. Positions closed by ADL pay no trading fee.
How liquidation, the insurance fund and ADL hand off
When your margin falls below maintenance margin (Gate words it as account maintenance margin ratio at or below 100%), the system takes over the position and closes it at market. If the fill is better than the bankruptcy price (the price at which your margin is exactly wiped out), the surplus goes to the insurance fund. If it is worse, the fund covers the shortfall. Bybit's help center says exactly this: a fill better than the bankruptcy price sends the remaining margin to the fund, and a fill worse than it is covered by the fund.
When the fund can't cover it, the system picks the top-ranked profitable positions on the opposite side and closes them against the bankrupt position at the bankruptcy price (or whatever price that exchange's rules set). That is ADL. The trader who gets deleveraged did nothing wrong; they were simply on the other side, in profit and highly leveraged.
Rules compared
| Exchange | Cost at liquidation | Leftover margin goes to | ADL trigger | ADL ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binance | Liquidation clearance fee on notional, rate in the trading rules; not charged on bankrupt positions | Profit from a bankrupt position stays in the insurance fund | When the insurance fund can't take over a bankrupt position | Profit and leverage, higher goes first |
| Bybit | We could not read a liquidation fee rate from the official page this time | Insurance fund, when filled better than bankruptcy price | 8-hour drawdown on a single pair reaching its trigger line (set per pair; official example 30%, stops at 25%) | Leveraged return |
| OKX | Liquidation fee = your current taker rate; clearance fee = maintenance margin at trigger | Net proceeds of both fees go to the security fund | Account still in deficit after liquidation and the security fund can't cover it (no numeric threshold on the page) | Profit rate and leverage |
| Gate | Liquidation fee rate 0.075% | Liquidation surplus goes to the insurance fund | When the insurance fund can't absorb the remaining position | Profitable positions: return ÷ maintenance margin ratio |
| Bitget | Not stated on the official ADL page | Not stated on the official ADL page | When that coin's insurance fund is used up; stops once it is positive again | Risk-adjusted ROI, profitable positions first |
Sources (checked 2026-10-17): Binance liquidation protocols (updated 2026-01-04), Binance ADL (updated 2026-01-13), Bybit insurance fund (updated 2026-03-24), Bybit ADL (updated 2026-04-13), OKX forced liquidation FAQ (updated 2026-10-05), Gate liquidation mechanism, Gate ADL, Bitget ADL (2025-09-27). Bitget's page contradicts itself on the ADL execution price (both mark price and bankruptcy price appear); the live official rules apply.
How much is in the insurance funds right now?
Four of the five publish their insurance fund balances through official public APIs that anyone can query. These are the numbers we read on 2026-10-17:
| Exchange | Scope | Balance | Data time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binance | Fund covering BTCUSDT (the same group includes ETHUSDT, BNBUSDT and others) | 791,125,863 USDT + 499,980,384 USDC | 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC |
| Bybit | Shared pool covering BTCUSDT (with ETH, SOL and over a hundred other pairs) | 387,572,748 USDT (51 USDT pools total about 530 million) | 2026-10-17 |
| OKX | BTC-USDT perpetual | 91,763,549 USDT (the API's total field is about 3.0 billion) | 2026-10-17 |
| Gate | USDT-margined perpetuals | 140,159,046 USDT | 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC |
| Bitget | We did not read an insurance fund balance from an official public API this time; not listed | ||
Data: official public APIs (Binance insuranceBalance, Bybit insurance, OKX insurance-fund, Gate insurance). Each exchange splits its pools differently, so the numbers can't be ranked directly. Bybit says shared pools update every 24 hours.
Read a fund's size together with what it has to cover. Bybit's BTCUSDT pool backs over a hundred pairs; Binance's fund covers several major contracts at once; Gate gives one figure for all USDT-margined perps. Small coins often sit in small isolated pools (Bybit has several with only a few million USDT), and those pairs hit ADL more easily.
A worked example: liquidation vs your own stop
Say you open a 10x BTC long on Gate with 1,000 USDT of margin, so 10,000 USDT notional. Gate's official API shows a 0.3% first-tier maintenance margin rate for BTC_USDT, which is 30 USDT.
- You close with a market stop just before liquidation: the fee is 10,000 × 0.05% = 5 USDT. With Gate bound through Fee Otter at 70% (20% automatic rebate from the exchange + 50% extra rebate) you pay 1.5 USDT net, and the rest of your margin stays in your account.
- The system liquidates you: the liquidation fee is 10,000 × 0.075% = 7.5 USDT. When liquidation triggers you have roughly the maintenance margin left. After the fee, if the fill beats the bankruptcy price, what remains goes to the insurance fund, not back to you.
- The same position on OKX: the liquidation fee is charged at your taker rate, plus a separate clearance fee equal to the maintenance margin at the moment of liquidation.
Liquidation fees, clearance fees and leftover margin sent to the insurance fund are not trading fees, so none of them earns a rebate. Only the fee on a close you place yourself is rebated. Setting a stop and not letting the system liquidate you is the cheapest way out.
How ADL reaches you: Bybit's official example
Bybit explains it with an example. A pair's insurance fund peaked at 20,000 USDC over the past 8 hours, with a 30% trigger line and a 25% stop line. Position margin on the pair is 1,000 USDC and combined realised and unrealised losses are 8,000 USDC. Drawdown = (8,000 − 1,000) ÷ 20,000 = 35%, above 30%, so ADL starts. The system derives a bankruptcy price from the 30% limit, the deleveraged side pays 2,000 USDC back into the fund to bring the drawdown to 30%, and ADL stops once the drawdown falls to 25% or less.
So ADL does not have to wait for the fund to hit zero. If you are running high leverage on a small coin and sitting on a big profit, you are at the front of the queue. Bybit says lowering leverage lowers your ADL ranking in real time; partly closing reduces how much can be deleveraged but leaves your ranking unchanged. Binance and Bybit both show an ADL indicator next to each position, and more lit bars mean you are closer to the front.
A real case: 10 October 2025
In the crash of 10 October 2025, more than 19 billion US dollars of leveraged positions were liquidated, and FTI Consulting's analysis says high leverage combined with exchanges' ADL turned the sell-off into a liquidation spiral (CoinGecko, FTI Consulting). Plenty of profitable shorts were closed by ADL that night: the profit was banked but the position was gone. Afterwards Binance paid about 283 million US dollars to futures, margin and loan users who had used USDe, BNSOL or WBETH as collateral and were hit when those assets depegged on its platform (The Block). That was the platform's own compensation, not a rule of the insurance fund or ADL.
Why the rules matter
Liquidation rules decide how much the worst case costs you; ADL decides whether your best case gets taken away early. You manage the first with stops and lower leverage, and the second by avoiding pairs with small funds and not staying highly leveraged while in profit. The fee on every ordinary open and close can be partly returned through a rebate; see perp fees: your effective rate after a rebate.